"Going for the Gold:
An Olympic Webquest"
THE RUBRIC BELOW WILL BE USED TO EVALUATE
YOUR COMPLETED WEBSITES.
| Beginning |
Developing |
Accomplished |
Item and Points |
0 points |
1 point |
2 points |
| Overall Layout |
The layout offers little appeal to
potential visitors. |
The layout offers an attractive appeal to
potential visitors. |
The layout is very exciting and attractive
to potential visitors. |
| Content |
Information is incomplete and unorganized. |
Information is mostly complete and is
organized to some extent. |
Information is complete and well
organized. |
| Language |
Many grammatical errors. Language is
uninteresting. |
There are few grammatical errors.
Descriptive language is used. |
There are very few or no grammatical
errors. Language is very descriptive. |
| Use of Technology |
Few or no images are
included. Images used are out of context. |
An adequate number of images
are used. Images clearly relate to the text. |
Full use of images without
overdoing it. Images fully support and compliment the written text. |
| Mechanics |
Sources of information and
images are not documented. |
Some sources of information
and images are documented. |
All sources of information and
images are well documented. |
Complete the following evaluation with your
teammates. Each area is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 points, with 0 meaning that your
group NEVER fulfilled the area requirement and 5 meaning that the group ALWAYS fulfilled
the area requirement.
Everyone in the group
contributed. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Everyone knew what we were trying to accomplish. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Everyone was able to stay on task. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Everyone was able to solve disagreements maturely. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Everyone was able to complete their portion of the website. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Teammates' points of view were valued and everyone worked in a cooperative
manner. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Teammates collected their information and shared it in a timely manner. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Everyone in the group used technology effectively to conduct their
research. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Your group presentation will be evaluated on
the following criteria. Each item will be rated on a scale of 0 to 5 points, with 0
meaning that NONE of the criteria was met and 5 meaning that ALL of the criteria
requirements were met.
The speakers addressed the
audience. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
The speakers maintained
eye contact with the audience. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
The presentation was made
in a natural, logical order. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
The speakers had good
voice clarity and projection. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
The presentation was
interesting. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
All parts of the website
were displayed. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
The speakers stuck to the
point.. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
The presentation was not
too short or too long. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
The presentation included
a conclusion. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Everyone in the group
participated in the presentation. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| TOTAL PRESENTATION POINTS |
/50 |
RETURN TO
"GOING FOR THE GOLD: AN OLYMPIC WEBQUEST"